Paris, 30th September, 2025 – The Consumer Goods Forum (CGF) Plastic Waste Coalition of Action has published a new discussion paper, “EPR for Packaging: Design and Implementation in Low-and Middle-Income Countries”, offering guidance to policymakers, industry leaders, and waste management stakeholders on how to design effective Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) systems for packaging in contexts where waste systems face systemic challenges.
The paper builds on the CGF’s 2022 Principles for Optimal EPR Design and provides tailored insights for low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), recognising the unique challenges and opportunities these markets face. These include limited solid waste infrastructure, complex institutional landscapes, and the critical role of workers from the large informal waste sector. Drawing on expertise from CGF leading multinational companies, the Fair Circularity Initiative (FCI) and local experts, the guidance underscores EPR as a key tool in addressing packaging waste and plastic pollution, provided it is supported by investments in waste and recycling systems.
“EPR systems have proven to be a powerful tool in advancing circularity in packaging, but their success in LMICs hinges on inclusive, well-funded, and context-aware design,” said Cédric Dever, Director, Plastic Waste at The Consumer Goods Forum. “This guidance is the result of deep collaboration between industry leaders, local experts, and partners such as the Fair Circularity Initiative, and we hope it will help create EPR systems that are both effective and equitable.”
The report outlines six essential design and implementation elements, with particular emphasis on three complex areas:
- Institutions: Recommending a professional, not-for-profit centralised institution governed by producers and responsible for implementing and governing the EPR system. If an alternative model is chosen, ensure all core functions are fulfilled by these institution(s).
- Infrastructure: Encouraging EPR systems that attract public and private investment to address critical waste management gaps and guarantee long-term service revenue and contracts.
- Integration of the informal sector: Providing practical principles to ensure waste pickers participation in EPR governance, fair compensation for their service, and facilitation of contracting with waste pickers organisations.
Anke Boykin, Senior Director, Global Environmental Policy, PepsiCo said, “Well-designed EPR systems can be an effective way to boost recycling and drive infrastructure investment. We recognize that one size does not fit all. This guidance aims to accelerate EPR in markets with diverse waste management conditions, including those where waste pickers play a critical role. PepsiCo is proud to have contributed to this work and aims to help shape inclusive EPR programs that can deliver positive environmental outcomes and help livelihoods at scale.”
Marloes van der Meer, Director at Systemiq, said: “At Systemiq, we are proud to have supported the CGF Plastic Waste Coalition of Action in shaping this paper. Low- and middle-income countries face distinct challenges and opportunities in designing and implementing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes – from limited waste systems to the role of the informal sector. This guidance offers practical, adaptable recommendations to help governments and businesses design effective EPR frameworks tailored to local realities, while also laying a foundation for greater harmonisation.”
Nicolas Ronderos, Associate Director, Collaborative Initiatives, BSR and The Fair Circularity Initiative said: “Waste pickers are the backbone of recycling systems, yet too often they face discrimination, unsafe conditions, and exclusion from basic rights. EPR schemes must respect their human rights by ensuring recognition, fair pay, and inclusion in decision-making. When waste pickers are integrated, waste is collected more effectively. When they are excluded, their livelihoods and rights are put at risk. Inclusive EPR is essential for both effectiveness and fairness.”
The guidance highlights that while EPR can be a game-changer for packaging waste, it is not a silver bullet. It must be implemented alongside broader investments in waste management systems and supported by coherent policies that promote reduction, reuse, and recycling.
The CGF would like to thank its members, the Fair Circularity Initiative (FCI), Systemiq, and local experts for their contributions in shaping this guidance.
The CGF welcomes continued feedback and dialogue on this evolving topic as part of its commitment to building a circular economy for plastics.
About The Consumer Goods Forum’s Plastic Waste Coalition of Action
Founded in 2020, the Plastic Waste Coalition of Action is a CEO-led initiative of more than 40 leading retailers, manufacturers, and packaging producers committed to building a circular economy for plastic packaging. Representing around 10% of global plastic packaging volumes, the Coalition works to ensure plastic never becomes waste or pollution by driving progress on design, reuse and refill, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), alternative materials, and global policy engagement. Through collective action, the Coalition develops scalable solutions, shapes the policy landscape, and helps businesses stay ahead of fast-changing regulations. Together, members are accelerating industry transformation and making circularity the norm across the consumer goods sector.